paedophilia

Can Wikisposure really be THIS stupid? Apparently they can...

Van: 
ro@muit.nl
Aan: 
admin@wikisposure.com
Datum: 
2009-10-23 18:11 +02:00
Onderwerp: 
If you 'expose' me... could you please do it CORRECTLY?

Hi again,

Please don't get me wrong here. If I call you a bunch of fucking morons (or language of that kind), further along in this e-mail, that is not meant to display anger. It is meant in a slap-on-the-shoulder kind of way.

The world will probably agree with me here, that this kind of stupidity is really only useful for making fun of. I'm starting to like you guys for it. You're my buddies.

Anyway... on to my point.

Addendum: analysis of the Wikisposure page

(That is, an addendum to this open letter.)

To me, the Wikisposure page about me [mirror] just looks dumb. That's because I know the background, so I can immediately see all the illogical word twisting that goes on.

I've noticed that some people don't see it that easily. So let's do some text analysis.

Open letter to Wikisposure

Guys and gals,

[A note: Since Wikisposure editors seem to be a secretive bunch, I have no way to see how you 'work' and no other way to address you than as one entity which thinks alike. I will just address this entity directly as "you".

See also Addendum: analysis of the Wikisposure page]

It's already 14 months since you published a piece on me [mirror]. (Just when I was at a conference, preparing for a new busy job abroad. Nice timing!) I have not reacted to it so far, because I have had about a thousand better things to do than care about your piece of fiction. But since I have some time now, and you're nowadays keeping ranked at #2 of the English language Google results for 'Roderik Muit', I'll give a public response.

I want to thank you for proving my point, and for making me snicker. About your absolute lack of guts and brains, that is.

E-mail to Wikisposure

After three weeks of Yvonne 'clueless lowlife' van Hertum boasting about getting me my own 'WikiSposure' page... I got tired of waiting and decided to ask them how the page was coming along.

(Hey, since I can't reason with these people, or make them stop, let's at least get a little fun out of this absurd theatre by playing along... right? And also, since I had not had any direct contact with WikiSposure/Perverted Justice yet, it would be decent of me to assume that they might not be clueless lowlifes themselves, might even respond to me normally, and maybe Yvonne might just be lying about them.)

I sent them below e-mail. No answer, ofcourse. Cowards :-p

Van: 
ro@muit.nl
Aan: 
admin@wikisposure.com
Datum: 
2008-03-08 01:48 +01:00
Onderwerp: 
My listing on wikisposure: is she bluffing?
Translation Note: The Engels version of this content is being displayed because the Nederlands translation is unavailable.

Hi,

Xavier von Erck in the house? Or anyone else who's talked to the people behind www.stopkindersex.com?

I have a question. But I need to introduce the issue first. Bear with me, please.

You see, StopKinderSex is this little 'organisation' (or so they'd like to call themselves) of -guesstimating- three people using eight different nicknames, with barely enough intelligence to spell their own names and a lot of display of self-importance to make up for it.

(I'm sure you, as a big and organisation handling such an important cause as 'fighting dirty pedos', can find volunteers who read Dutch, to verify this claim. It takes the average person about 10 minutes to see that the only activity going on on that weblog is dishing out false claims, infighting with clueless lunatic 'pedos' who noone takes seriously anyway, copy-pasting from other sources, and displaying their own lack of intelligence in the comments and the few -repetitive- 'articles' they make up themselves. But aaaaanyway...)

The main woman behind this site, Yvonne van Hertum, has been plastering my name plus picture all over her weblog, and "investigating" me with hilarious results (mainly other people being angry at her). It hasn't done me any real damage because she's known as a lunatic (general googling will tell you that), but I'm getting reaaaalllllly tired of it by now.

The issue is: Yvonne/StopKinderSex has been mentioning your name repeatedly, saying they're working with you and that I'd get a WikiSposure page, since february 21st. References: http://www.stopkindersex.com/?p=1511 (they're calling you "our partners"), http://www.stopkindersex.com/?p=1529 (false allegiations about me and the first sentence saying that I'll be on WikiSposure very soon) and http://www.stopkindersex.com/?p=1531 (claiming Xavier Von Erck has been writing something for them). Wikisposure is being mentioned

So.... Here's my question to you (finally! Yeah I know I write too much):

Are you indeed working on a page about me, for the section 'Dutch Activists'? Or is the bitch full of it / have you by now decided that you don't want to be associated with her/them?

Thanks,

Roderik.

P.S. this may strike you as a strange question. I imagine the average e-mail you get is more like a threat "if you publish this info you will" or pleas not to post it.

I'm not threatening or pleading anything. First of all, I think it would be useless arguing with you. And secondly, I believe in freedom of speech and freedom of information. If someone wants to 'out' me, they can go right on ahead, if they think it has any importance. As long as they tell the truth.

But I think it gives ME the freedom too, to have information and to be able to counter any lies and false information. Given that I still assume your credibility and intelligence is at least a little higher than Yvonne/StopKinderSex's... I think you'll agree with me that you can tell me whether or not you're talking to the woman and/or still taking her seriously.
(My opinion is: if you want to be taken seriously, ditch her and tell her to stop using your name. But hey, who am I...)

Dealing with the anti-peds

[ Note: this text has grown WAY too long and become a mix-up of an opinion piece and a personal story. Partly because this is my first English text (since 2001), I guess. I may have a look at it again later and see what to do with it. ]

Can I just rant for a bit?

I've been around for a few years now, hosting some controversial content on blueboxserver.net. Because I know the sense behind it and the good it can do.

The 'Roderik is attracted to younger boys' FER

Boys and girls! Before I begin lecturing, let me first give you some background information.